Sunday, November 30, 2008

The American Home

One of the sessions I was able to attend at the GB conference was Kevin O'Conner (host of This Old House) along with Ted Benson (modular homes) and Steve Kieran (architect). The whole theme was the transformation of the American home through the 20th century, and the idea that the pendulum of consumption has swung to its extreme and has no direction to go but back towards normalcy. For example, in 1900, the number of homes in the US was 16mil, compared to 105mil in 2000, which is close to twice the percent increase of population during that time (75mil to 280mil). In addition, the median home size in 1900 was for 7 people (seven!) whereas in 2000 is was 2 people (currently, close to one quarter of all homes in the US are single person homes). We all know the average family size is currently 2.6 people, well, in the middle of the century it was 4.6 people. It's not that hard to grasp the drastic drop in family size, unless you compare it to the fact that average home size has more than doubled since the middle of the century (currently 2300sf). That suggests the average person has over 3 times as much space in their home than they did mid century (from 300sf to 1000sf). Bigger homes for less people.
It is this trend, the trend of excess consumption that has allowed the US to be the world leader in resource consumption and the world leader in emissions. Please do not get me wrong in my accusations, I am not scolding large dwellings in this setting (I'll save that for a different setting), but I am scolding the efficiency of our built environment. Ted Benson had a great quote which was:
"Economic bubbles and cheap energy deepen the ruts and make us stupid. That's what happened to many of us in the 80's and 90's. Energy was cheap, homes got big, people got silly. We built some beautiful homes in that era but they weren't the smartest. But recessions, like this one, and high energy costs jerk us on to new paths and create opportunities, because we get very creative."
The trick, which was mentioned in several forums, is to make the connection from the capital cost of building to the O&M cost that the building developer passes on to the future building owner. Developers need to be more conscience and responsible of the way their building will operate, and purchasers need to be more knowledgeable of what they are buying, and if it is built efficiently with properly sized HVAC systems and adequate insulation so that the price they are paying isn't skewed by the ongoing energy costs.
None of this is new and innovative, but merely an organized onservation from the past 110 years, and what we have become. Learning from history can sometimes give us good perspectives on what what causes our trends and what we have to focus on to fix them.

To view the presentation (unfortunately sans slides) go to: http://www.greenbuild365.org/GreenExpoVideoDetail.aspx?GreenExpoID=34

Greenbuild 365

Just a quick note that many of the master speakers from GreenBuild 2008 (including Majora Carter) were videotaped and you can watch their presentations here:

http://www.greenbuild365.org/pagemaker.aspx?PID=67

You can also see presentations from last year as well. GreenBuild 365 is also a good source for training in a variety of areas.

I wanted to share this because there were several people who had expressed interest in going to the conference but couldn't.

Saturday, November 29, 2008

Cenocell

Cenocell is a great development in the use of SCMs (supplementary cementitious materials) to the effect of changing the S from "supplementary" to completely "substitutionary." Many currently used ready mixes already contain a good portion of ash or slag (both considered 100& post-industral recycled), but what is so spectacular about this Cenocell is not only is it 100% SCM, but that it doesn't require aggregates, which are the primary source of compressive strength in typical mixes (I'm sure they would still use steel reinforcement for tensile strength). 7000psi is definitely a high strength mix (although certain large applications require much higher).
The price ($50/yd) actually isn't that outrageous, and I'm sure it will come down after time, but the only catch is it needs to be heated to cure. That means all members have to either be precast when brought to site, or there must be some sort of large oven machine on site. Keep in mind the need to 'bake' it increases the embodied energy (however it's quite possible the net embodied energy is less).
Only other concern would be in regard to leachate, since fly ash contains metals that could leach hazardous materials if coming into contact with acids.
Regardless, this could be really big, the fact that there is a 'renewable resource' that is so light and strong by itself. Thanks Doyoyo (cool name, too).

Monday, November 17, 2008

LEED ND

One of the biggest criticisms of the USGBC and specifically LEED was that for a while it focused too much on a small scale and neglected principles of regional strategies and sustainable planning. However it recently developed LEED for Neighborhood Development and as of today, the 2009 draft version is open for public comment. See below.

----------

LEED for Neighborhood Development 2009 Open for Public Comment

USGBC is pleased to invite the public to comment on the LEED for Neighborhood Development Rating System, which integrates the principles of smart growth, new urbanism and green building into the first national system for neighborhood design. The program is a collaborative effort between USGBC, the Congress for the New Urbanism, and the Natural Resources Defense Council.

This rating system is built upon the LEED for Neighborhood Development Pilot Rating System, which nearly 240 projects have been using since July 2007 as part of a successful pilot program. Eighteen projects have been certified. Their invaluable feedback, combined with countless hours of USGBC volunteer time, has produced a more sophisticated, market-responsive rating system. 

Any member of the public may submit comments. To view the rating system draft and comment, please go the LEED Rating System Drafts webpage. The public comment period will be open from November 17th through January 5, 2009 at 11:59 PST.

For more information about the LEED for Neighborhood Development program please visit our website

http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CMSPageID=148

Masdar

http://www.24dash.com/news/Housing/2008-11-17-Team-behind-worlds-first-zero-carbon-zero-waste-city-to-visit-UK

I would imagine there would be some concern over the one of the Es (equity) as I'm sure it would cost a pretty penny to live in this place once it's built (merely because of the prestige). Also with the current financial mess, are foreign investors that unaffected that they are still willing to invest?

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Shrooms

I gotta give Damon props for opening my eyes to TED.org (it's all I've done the past 3 nights). This one blew my mind. This guy uses mushrooms to sequester CO2, biodegrade oil spills and provide energy. Be careful, he talks really fast, but I present to you...Paul Stamets:

http://ted.org/index.php/talks/paul_stamets_on_6_ways_mushrooms_can_save_the_world.html

Sky Wind

How about a wind farm in the sky? That's where the big winds are. Check this out...

http://www.skywindpower.com/ww/index.htm

Any skepticism you have is probably valid. I asked a friend of mine who works at a global wind-power company and he said it's pretty far from being 'viable.' There are a lot of safety implications as you can imagine. Maintenance is also considerably more difficult. However once it goes it has great potential.